Design of Helical Coil-Gun Based on Self-Induction Coefficient and Projectile Size Optimization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7250/ecce-2025-0002Keywords:
Ferromagnetic projectile, FPGA, genetic algorithm, Helical coil gun, LabVIEWAbstract
Electromagnetic Launcher (EML) systems are classified into two main categories based on their fundamental operating principles: rail guns and coil guns. Rail guns accelerate a conductive projectile using magnetic force by passing a high current between two parallel rails, but they suffer from wear and heat accumulation due to mechanical contact. Coil launchers use electromagnets to accelerate ferromagnetic or conductive projectiles without contact, thus minimising energy losses and wear. Rail guns are preferred in military applications requiring high velocity and kinetic energy, whereas coil guns are more prominent in controlled acceleration applications such as space launch systems and laboratory experiments. Since the velocity of the generated electromagnetic field in coil launchers has no theoretical limit, the accelerated projectile also does not have a predefined velocity limit. However, the use of randomly sized coils and an increased number of sequential coils in coil guns disrupts the linearity of the projectile velocity increase. To address this issue, this study develops a “New Helical Coil Gun”, consisting of four-stage helical coils designed to achieve linear velocity increase. First, the self-inductance coefficient of a coil was simulated based on the time-dependent variations of the current passing through it, and the inductance value that could provide a maximum instantaneous current of 25A (without direction change) under laboratory conditions was determined. Then, the design of the helical coil with a rectangular cross-section to provide this coefficient value was implemented. This design was then transferred to the ANSYS Maxwell magnetic analysis software, where an optimisation process was conducted to determine the ideal projectile size that would maximise the magnetic force exerted on a ferromagnetic projectile when a 25 A current was applied to the coil. Following this stage, a “Helical Coil Gun”, composed of four-stage helical coils, was designed and manufactured based on the determined projectile and coil dimensions. Optical sensors were placed at the initial positions of the coils to measure the projectile’s velocity. An FPGA-based project was developed for data acquisition, processing, and triggering control. This project, designed using the LabVIEW FPGA module, was carried out on the NI myRIO-1950 board containing Xilinx FPGA. After each launch, the collected data was stored on a flash drive connected to myRIO and monitored in real time via a display. What distinguishes this study from literature is its approach to determining the optimal coil geometry by correlating the current variation characteristics with the coil’s self-inductance coefficient and using Genetic Algorithm-based optimisation to identify the ideal projectile size that achieves maximum velocity under maximum force. Experiments with the developed coil gun showed that the projectile velocity change from the beginning of the first coil to the end of the fourth coil was linear.
References
T. G. Engel, “Scientific classification method for electromagnetic launchers,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1333–1338, May 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2017.2705177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2017.2705177
T. G. Engel, J. M. Neri, and M. J. Veracka, “The maximum theoretical efficiency of constant inductance gradient electromagnetic launchers,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 608–614, Feb. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2009.2014379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2009.2014379
T. G. Engel and M. J. Veracka, “The voltage-current scaling relationship and impedance of DC electromagnetic launchers,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1271–1276, Apr. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2015.2418053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2015.2418053
A. Sibilska-Mroziewicz, E. Ładyżyńska-Kozdraś, and K. Sibilski, “VR-supported analysis of UAV – magnetic launcher’s cart system,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 10, May 2023, Art. no. 4095. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16104095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16104095
E. Ładyżyńska-Kozdraś, A. Sibilska-Mroziewicz, K. Sibilski, D. Potoka, and A. Żyluk, “Dynamics of separation of unmanned aerial vehicles from the magnetic launcher cart during takeoff,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 13, June 2023, Art. no. 2883. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132883
S. Basaran, M. Altinkilic, and S. Sivrioglu, “A linear motor launcher system integrating a multisurface superconducting magnetic bearing,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1–7, May 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2023.3275303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2023.3275303
G. Li, X. Wang, P. Cui, and J. Li, “Analysis of superconducting linear synchronous motor for electromagnetic propulsion,” Cluster Computing, vol. 22, pp. 2709–2717, Jan. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1434-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1434-y
S. Ozkucuk and M. C. Kulahli, “Solar photovoltaic source based magnetic launcher simulation design with thermal requirements consideration,” Renewable Energy, vol. 145, pp. 1004–1013, Jan. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.073
S. Guan, X. Guan, J. Shi, and B. Wu, “Numerical analysis and measurement of high in-bore magnetic field of synchronous induction coil launcher,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 3447–3458, Dec. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3139672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3139672
M. Ma, T. Wei, Z. Xu, Z. Xu, H. Li, and W. Qunjing, “Electromagnetic interference analysis of permanent magnet linear synchronous launchers,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1309–1315, Apr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2020.2983472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2020.2983472
M. M. M. Abdo, H. El-Hussieny, T. Miyashita, and S. M. Ahmed, “Design of a new electromagnetic launcher based on the magnetic reluctance control for the propulsion of aircraft-mounted microsatellites,” Applied System Innovation, vol. 6, no. 5, Sep. 2023, Art. no. 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi6050081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/asi6050081
B. Cheng, “The design and simulation of a novel electromagnetic launcher with permanent magnet,” in 2022 7th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research (ICMERR), Krakow, Poland, Dec. 2022, pp. 114–117. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMERR56497.2022.10097818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMERR56497.2022.10097818
I. R. McNab, “Brief history of the EML symposia: 1980–2018,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 2136–2142, Dec. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2018.2885269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2018.2885269
S. Kondamudi and M. R. Pasumarthi, “Computations of magnetic forces in multipole field electromagnetic launcher,” International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, vol. 4, no. 3, Apr. 2019, Art. no. 761. https://doi.org/10.33889//IJMEMS.2019.4.3-059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33889//IJMEMS.2019.4.3-059
K. Manohar and K. Srichandan, “Analysis of quadrupole magnetic field reluctance-based launcher with different coil switching patterns,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1370–1376, Apr. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2023.3266515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2023.3266515
S. Boisseau et al., “An autonomous switch based on a rotating magnet driven by magnetic launchers,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 30, no. 2, Jan. 2021, Art. no. 02LT01. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/abd7e8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/abd7e8
H. Deng, Y. Wang, G. Fan, L. Liang, and Z. Yan, “Design and test of a single-stage double-layer multipole field electromagnetic launcher with a rotational performance,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 112008–112014, Aug. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935111
O. Çetin, H. Özbay, A. Dalcalı, and F. Temurtaş, “An experimental study on sensorless determination of the projectile position by artificial neural network in magnetic launcher systems,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 3970–3979, Nov. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2021.3123064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2021.3123064
B. Zhang, Y. Kou, K. Jin, and X. Zheng, “A multi-field coupling model for the magnetic-thermal-structural analysis in the electromagnetic rail launch,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 519, Feb. 2021, Art. no. 167495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167495
T. Li, G. Feng, C. Du, and P. Zhang, “Analysis of electromagnetic characteristics of copper-steel composite quadrupole rail,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 17, Aug. 2022, Art. no. 5851. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175851
D. Ceylan, M. Karagöz, Y. Çevik, B. Yıldırım, H. Polat, and O. Keysan, “Simulations and experiments of EMFY-1 electromagnetic launcher. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 3336–3343, May 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2019.2916220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2019.2916220
M. P. Galanin, A. K. Kondratenko, V. V. Lukin, A. S. Rodin, and D. L. Sorokin, “Methods of numerical modeling of a railgun with magnetization turns,” Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics, vol. 92, pp. 820–828, July 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-019-01991-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-019-01991-x
B. Cheng, “The development of a novel coil gun with permanent magnet,” in 2023 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Seattle, WA, USA, June 2023, pp. 531–536. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIM46323.2023.10196246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/AIM46323.2023.10196246
P. Stone, “Electromagnetic launcher,” in 2021 IEEE Pulsed Power Conference (PPC), Denver, CO, USA, Dec. 2021, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/PPC40517.2021.9749836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/PPC40517.2021.9749836
H. Chen, Y. Zhan, R. Nie, and S. Zhao, “Multiobjective optimization design of tubular permanent magnet linear launcher,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 2486–2492, Feb. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2019.2896886 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2019.2896886
N. M. Noor, I. Aris, N. Misron, S. Shafie, and P. Iqbal, “Performance analysis of the linear launcher motor via modelling and simulation for light electric vehicles,” Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science, vol. 29, no. 1, Jan. 2021. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.29.1.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.29.1.05
F. W. Grover, “Formulas and tables for the calculation and design of single-layer coils,” Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 193–208, Apr. 1924. https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1924.219955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1924.219955
D. Yang, Z. Liu, T. Shu, L. Yang, and J. Ouyang, “Design and testing of a coil-unit barrel for helical coil electromagnetic launcher,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 89, no. 1, Jan. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5001882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5001882
M. T. Bhoskar, M. O. K. Kulkarni, M. N. K. Kulkarni, M. S. L. Patekar, G. M. Kakandikar, & V. M. Nandedkar, “Genetic algorithm and its applications to mechanical engineering: A review,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 2, no. 4–5, pp. 2624–2630, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.219
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yavuz Ege, Hakan Citak, Sabri Bicakci, Huseyin Gunes, Mustafa Coramik (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.