Development of impact aggregation procedure for sustainable transport system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10144-009-0035-xKeywords:
MCDM, MCDA, sustainable transport, public transport, electrical transport, UTA methodAbstract
In the investigation, the problems of utility evaluation methodology application for transport development projects evaluation are described. The main steps of development of impact aggregation procedure for sustainable transport system are described in the article. The new 3 stage environmental impact aggregation procedure is suggested.References
COST 356 - Towards the definition of a measurable environmentally sustainable transport. cost356.inrets.fr/
S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, R. Słowiński,: Axiomatic characterization of a general utility function and its particular cases in terms of conjoint measurement and rough-set decision rules. European J. of Operational Research, 158 (2004) no. 2, 271-292
Čaiko, N. Kuņicina, A Patļins., A. Pelņiķis, L. Ribickis Development of decision-making procedure of choice of the equipment for railway crossing at stations // Transport means 2008, Transport Means 2008, Lietuva, Kaunass, 23.-24. oktobris, 2008. - 151-154. lpp.
S. Russel, P. Norvig, Artificial intelligence a modern approach second edition Prentice Hall.2002 1058p.
G. Weiss, Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence.-Cambridge (Mass.):London: MIT Press-2000.-619p.
M. Mezitis "Microprocessor centralization systems reaction time reduction", Vilnius: VGTU 2005.
R. Słowiński, S. Greco MCDS With set of utility functions or a set of decision rules compatible with holistic preference information MCDM Conference, Chania, Greece, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Antons Patlins, Nadezhda Kunicina (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
